If a compliance software is priced at $12,000 per year. What is the cost?
It all depends on the item you’re replacing.
If $12,000 is used to save hundreds of hours collecting evidence in a complex technological environment that could be worth investing. If a seven-person startup could gather the same data manually in a few hours each month, the calculation is quite different.
It’s an effective way to start your look for Vanta. Identifying the platform with the best features is not the only thing to consider. Ask how much time and effort those tools can help save your company.
Automated Manufacturing Comes with an End-of-Even
Automating compliance isn’t inherently beneficial or harmful. The value of it changes as you grow. Imagine an expanding technology company with multiple cloud environments as well as various applications. The effort of manually capturing evidence constantly could be extremely high. Integrations that automatically monitor systems and collect evidence may quickly justify their cost.
Imagine a startup with 10 employees preparing for their first SOC 2. It may have a relatively smaller infrastructure, and the gathering of evidence can be managed with no significant automation.
That difference matters when evaluating Vanta pricing. A sophisticated platform can provide significant capabilities, however those capabilities deliver financial value only when the company actually needs the capabilities.
Compare Architecture and Not Just Brands
A search for Vanta vs Drata can quickly become a feature-by-feature exercise. Both platforms are built upon automation and are integrated, so organizations looking for this approach can benefit from looking at the frameworks they support along with their integrations and services along with individual quotations and contracts.
However, there’s another choice you have to take. Does your business want an integration-driven compliance platform at all? Certain businesses require automated evidence collection as well as continuous monitoring. Some businesses prefer to collect evidence on their own.
Vanta Competitors don’t all follow the same model
A number of well-known Vanta competitors compete within a similar automation-focused category. On the market, there are platforms that have a more minimalist design which are focused more on the system’s organization, rather and connectivity.
CertAssist belongs to the latter group. CertAssist was developed by internal auditors, compliance consultants, and other professionals, organizes controls frameworks in a central place. It allows for the editing of guidelines and policies for evidence and allows auditors to look over evidence using read-only access.
It doesn’t install agents or connect to infrastructure systems. Customers upload their own documentation.
Factor System Access Into the Decision
It is evident that the removal of integrations can be a disadvantage. It is necessary to collect evidence by hand.
This eliminates the need for integration and the application of compliance does not require a connection to the operating environment.
The design and architecture of one is not superior to the other. Which choice is best for your business?
CertAssist is aimed at teams comprising between five and 200 individuals. It also publishes its pricing rather than requiring for a sales meeting to get the price at which to start. Its advertised launch price is $225 per month in contrast to a typical price of $375 monthly.
Let Complexity Have Its Proper Place
The requirements for a start-up that a 10 person company has today might differ at 500 or 100 employees.
A lighter platform can make sense if compliance remains easy. The economics of automation can grow as systems, staff and frameworks expand. Let complexity play a role when buying compliance technologies.
Don’t spend money on fifty integrations merely because they appear attractive on a comparison chart. They’re worth it to perform the tasks they replace is more expensive than manually performing them.
